While academic medical centers have long run on hospitals generating the margin, medical schools advancing education and research, and faculty practice plans delivering patient care, that three-part arrangement is under financial strain.
Drawing on data from 61 AMCs, Vizient’s March 23 article, “The Shifting Economics of Academic Medicine,” written by Matthew Bates and Michael Bausch, and produced by Vizient Member Networks in collaboration with Kaufman Hall, details where the money goes and raises questions about whether the institutions are getting what they pay for.
“Hospital margins are slim and at risk; federal funds for research and teaching are under threat; and there is an increasing demand for capital and new technology investments,” the article said. “There are rising physician employment costs, intensifying internal competition for clinical support and growing investments in education and training. Clinical workforce shortages are more pressing than ever. All of these factors have stressed the traditional model, so that what once looked like a sustainable financial arrangement today resembles structural imbalance.”
Here’s are five things to know:
1. The article found that median funds flow equaled 12.8% of academic hospital net patient revenue, with faculty spending 72% of their time on clinical work. However, it found no direct correlation between spending and stronger quality outcomes, and no link between spending and stronger hospital margins. The differentiators for sustainable funds flow models were accountability, alignment and governance.
2. Academic physicians accepted lower pay for many years in exchange for the stability and opportunity in academic medicine, but the article asserts that arrangement is eroding. Faculty in certain markets are now expecting compensation that compares to their non-academic counterparts, and key specialty shortages have intensified the pressure. As the “academic discount” disappears, hospitals and practice plans are left absorbing increasing physician costs while still supporting education and research that rarely cover the costs.
Governance structures can also worsen the problem. With hospitals, faculty practice plans and schools of medicine operating as separate legal entities at many academic health systems, areas of authority can overlap and limit shared accountability. Each entity tends to protect its own interests, often to the detriment of the whole, and without integrated governance, funding decisions can default to historical precedent rather than strategic intent.
3. The article found that AMCs are funding residency slots at a median of 1.5 times their federally funded residency cap. However, many institutions don’t track whether these investments pay off. Retention rates for residents trained beyond the federal cap are largely unknown, with little evidence that the graduates fill priority specialties or cut reliance on expensive temporary staffing.
4. Clinical leadership has reached 5% of total funds flow, with no quantifiable link to enterprise performance in growth, margin, quality or workforce. Leadership compensation is often structured as supplemental pay for administrative duties rather than a defined role tied to results.
“Rising physician workforce shortages including caps on resident hours have placed significant pressure on the cost of labor,” the article said. “As salaries for advanced practice providers rise, additional medical residents might appear to be a less expensive alternative. However, APPs and residents are not the same and often do not possess the same skillset; and many practices make inefficient use of their APPs.”
5. The article pointed to four levers to help combat AMC challenges: strategic alignment, financial transparency, shared governance and accountability.
“Academic medicine needs smarter, more strategic stewardship,” it said. “The institutions that confront uncomfortable truths about how their models actually work, not how they were designed to work decades ago, are more likely to adapt and thrive. The academic mission is essential, but its sustainability requires it be grounded in economic reality.”
The post Academic medical models are under financial strain: 5 things to know appeared first on Becker's Hospital Review | Healthcare News & Analysis.
Source: Read Original Article
